Should Loch Lomond or Loch Ness be the scenic waters on your Scotland must sees list? Here’s a side-by-side, fact-by-fact comparison.
Lomond and Ness are both large lochs with well-developed tourism resources and both near cities and airports. (Hint: but there are prettier lochs around!)
So, you are planning your route through Scotland and wondering if either of these two famous bodies of water are worth a visit? Loch Lomond or Loch Ness? Are they really worth a look?
(Pictured here) Looking north-west across the large island of Inchmurrin on Loch Lomond towards the Luss Hills. (Inchmurrin is the largest freshwater loch island in the British Isles.)
Visitors have heard of Loch Ness, of course, because of the monster myth, while Loch Lomond owes its fame at least in part to the well-known song ‘The Banks of Loch Lomond’.
Loch Lomond is also famous through geography: it’s in a part of the Highlands that lies closest to the Central Belt, most densely populated part of Scotland. So that makes it easy to visit.
(Pictured here) Loch Lomond, looking north from Duncryne Hill. One of the very best viewpoints anywhere near the loch.
A view from the edge of the Lowlands into the Highlands. The Highland/Lowland demarcation – the Highland Boundary Fault – runs through the islands in the picture.
(Pictured here) Jacobite Cruises offer a variety of excursions on Loch Ness.
Their vessels (especially when meeting others) sometimes create conflicting wakes whose hump-like contours can cause a moment of excitement…though mostly in the gullible.
Loch Ness is further away!
Loch Ness occupies part of the Great Glen, for centuries a throughway between the east and west coasts of Scotland.
Because it is further away from the heavily populated Lowlands, it has not had the long-standing reputation for beautiful Highland scenery associated with Loch Lomond.
Instead of a reputation for scenic attraction alone, Loch Ness was the setting for the most successful press and PR coup in the Scottish tourism industry in the 20th century – the famous Loch Ness Monster Phenomenon.
(The phenomenon perhaps being that people only see what they want to see!)
Lomond and Ness statistics
(Ness = LN : Lomond = LL)
**Size by volume**
LL- 92,000 million ft3 / 2.6km3.
LN – 263,000 million ft3 / 7.3km3.
**Size by surface area**
LL – 56.4 km2
LN – 71km2
LL – Yes, massive, Lomond Shores at Balloch.
LN – Mostly at lochside visitor centres, smaller scale.
LL – Yes, in countryside and also in small lochside communities.
LN – As Loch Lomond.
LL – Plenty of stop-offs and viewpoints, some, like Firkin Point, very well known.
LN – Some, though less well-developed than Loch Lomond.
LL – Cuts through Highland Boundary Fault, embracing Lowland and Highland. Big hills like Ben Lomond close by. Fine deciduous woodlands in places.
LN – Fills part of a major geological fault line. Hills more uniform and less spectacular. Heavily wooded.
LL – Yes, plus extensive timetable of ‘water taxis’ and connections.
LN – yes, especially programme of monster spotting cruises.
**Bank traversed by busy main road?**
LL – Yes
LN – Yes
**Alternative route on other bank?**
LL – part-way by car (to Rowardennan) then good footpath.
LN – part-way by car (to Inverfarigaig) then all the way to Fort Augustus but not on loch shore.
LL – Glasgow, say, 30-40 mins by car.
LN – Inverness, say, 20 mins by car.
**Distance from Edinburgh (to nearest point)**
LL – 65 miles / 104 km (Balmaha).
LN – 158 miles / 253 km (Fort Augustus.)
LL – Good connections by bus and train.
LN – Good service, lochside buses.
LL – No
LN – No
LL – Yes, but less well known than Nessie.
LN – Oh yes.
**Visitor attraction about monster?**
LL – No
LN – Yes
**Alternative pretty loch in vicinity?**
LL – Other lochs in nearby Trossachs: eg Loch Katrine.
LN – Loch Affric much prettier.
**Features in well-known traditional song?**
LL – Yes
LN – No. Ken Dodd’s 1960s hit ‘Happy Ness’ is not about the loch.
But Should I Visit
Loch Lomond or Loch Ness?
“Wait a second” (I hear you say), “you haven’t actually said which of the two you should visit.”
You noticed, huh? Well, both are on a well established tourist trail and neither are off the beaten track, (see links below) – far from it, actually.
If you are a first-time visitor to Scotland, you’ll tend to tick off the hot-spots first. So there is an element of ‘unavoidability’ about both these lochs as they are both on well-established visitor routes through Scotland.
Hey – since you ask – I’d rather be on the shores of (say) Loch Maree, Loch Assynt, Loch Hope and a load of smaller lochs further north. I’d rather see (say) Loch Arkaig or Loch Affric if I was nearer Loch Ness, or enjoy a stroll along the shores of Loch Katrine if near Loch Lomond.
But, for sure, Lochs Ness and Lomond are bonnie enough…